Lord forgive them, cause they do not know what they are eating
A Sow mess is it what is happen with the animal, it is a blame we never can can not make amends, there are moments where I am ashamed to call me human cause I let this be
Mhmm, yummy, yummy ! From now on, always think about what could be on your plate.
We live on and through animals and also vegetarians live through animals
It is a chain. If we break this chain then we do not know how it will react about that, because we have been dealing with it just a very short time. The existing species extinction will cause us still big problems. We can imagine that we could only live with a limited number of desired animals and treat them like the waste we export to other countries. But that will not work like that. For sure not. Aside from the disgust that the thought of such food creates, this type of food is of course poisonous. The animals are on the one hand supplied with cheap food and on the other pumped full of medication. Of course it can be also different, here an organic farm as a good example. (Picture below) This animals are obviously well. Until the slaughter they can enjoy a nice life, which unfortunately can not be say by the wild animals. That's what it's all about. If we go on like that, we should stop calling ourselves humanely.
Endangered species are species of which only a few individuals live in the wild. The World Conservation Union IUCN summarizes them on the so-called: "Red List of Endangered Species". Animals are divided into levels ranging from least concern (vulnerable) to critically endangered and extinct in the wild Wildlife extinct.
Why are animals at risk of extinction?
In many cases, the animals have lost their natural habitat. In many others hunting, poaching and trafficking of young animals is the reason. If there are only a few animals of a species, there is virtually no chance for the survival of the species. Even if the few living animals reproduce, the genetic material can not be mixed well. The result is hereditary diseases.
Ave, Caesar, morituri te salutant
Amur Leopard, Mountain Gorilla, Hawksbill Turtle, Black Rhino, South China Tiger, Sumatran Orang Utan, Yangtze Finless Porpoise, Javan Rhino, Sumatran Tiger, Cross River Gorilla, Sumatran Rhino, Sumatran Elephant, Malagasy Beaked Breast Tortoise, Saola...
... Homo sapiens
The greeting of the doomed to his Caesar is well known
What is less well known, however, is the fact that humans started to eradicate wildlife at a very young age. So probably also the extinction of the mammoths on the Homo sapiens back. At that time, the number of people was only a few million and after went back by about half, they had almost exterminated themselves. Homo sapiens saved the now emerging agriculture, ironically the organic farming. The only difference to today was that the people of that time were really hungry and had to change from nomadism to a sedentary farmer. Today's humans responsible for the extermination of the animals operate this out of pure greed and do not want to see this. But they want to see the animals, therefore a mass of tourists are invading Africa. Whether that is the solution I dare to doubt.
The market rules everything
In the spring of 2013, a survey from Bonn (Germany) caused a stir around the world:
Together with colleagues, the economist Armin Falk had around 1,000 students decide on the life of a mouse: they were either given ten Euros as a gift, but they accepted that the mouse was killed - or they renounced the money and saved the life of the rodents for it. The result: 45 percent of the subjects opted for the ten Euros and against the mouse. However, the second part of the experiment was especially interesting: the students were divided into "sellers" and "buyers". The sellers decided about the life of the mouse; The buyers each had 20 Euros available to negotiate with the sellers. If both sides came to a "deal", so they agreed on how they divided the 20 Euros among themselves, the mouse died - if the deal burst, the mouse remained alive. The subjects were able to participate in several rounds with different "business partners" negotiate at the same time - as in a "normal" market. The result: 75 percent opted for the money and against the life of the mouse. On average, the subjects were ready for 6.40 Euros to accept the death of an animal. This means: In the market situation even less moral considerations prevailed. Incidentally, the mice were actually killed - and only at the very end did the participants learn that they were animals from animal experiments that were "superfluous" and would have been killed anyway, which in turn is already A-social. In a real social market economy, you could save the animals and even get something reasonable on the table.
To the top